Whitespeak®™

Typically (White) English

2011-12-30T10:03:00.003Z

(Image: http://projectbritain.com/)

Hypocrisy - never practising what they preach;
pretending British/English are labels that apply to every British/English person when they only mean them to apply to Whites;
solipsism;
narcissism;
ignorant;
angry when you do not agree with them; eg, "That is your opinion?";
White men assume White women are property; eg, "Our women";
panicking when they realise how universally unpopular they are with other ethnicities; eg, "Why do they hate us so much?";
alcoholism;
standing in doorways;
impatient;
using shopping trolleys as crutches;
dependent on others for self-esteem;
talk more than they do;
not very good in bed;
paranoid/schizophrenic;
unfriendly;
the desperate need for others to think them wonderful, so that they can think it themselves;
puritanical fear of the pleasures and success of others;
social snobbery;
resentment at the loss of the British Empire;
being poor listeners;
being unable to objectively-define either Britishness or Englishness;
always talking about themselves;
being insincere & superficial;
believing values possess a nationality; eg, "British values";
believing in legislating-for-love; eg, Laws against Sedition & Treason;
believing Jobs have Nationalities; eg, "British Jobs for British People";
believing British people are better than anyone else; eg, Institutional Racism & Northern Ireland;
believing British/English means having only White skin;

laziness; eg, Whites are owed a living since it should be: "British Jobs for British People";

having no culture other than pretending England is a great country with no examples of this greatness given;

confusing the Personal with the Political; Wit with Sarcasm; Sex with Love; Irony with sincerity;

being proud of other English people's achievements as a substitute for one's own lack of achievement;

being angry - especially when told the truth about themselves;

believing England to be unique with no evidence ever given;

being unable to adapt to changing global circumstances;

working long hours to avoid facing an empty personal life;

wanting to get skin cancer by needlessly exposing themselves (& their children) to the sun;

eating in front of the television rather than at the table;

loving animals more than people;

endlessly talking about the weather;

poking their noses into other people's business / talking about others for malicious reasons;

schadenfreude;

lack of genuine creativity in music, painting nor the arts generally; except Shakespeare & Chaplin (neither of whom is respected by the English, now);

poor personal hygiene; eg, a dearth of domestic bidets & not washing hands after urinating;

untidy homes;

giving up at the first hurdle, then blaming it on Society;

being loud and inappropriately aggressive to vainly conceal shyness;

poor social skills;

soccer hooliganism;

drinking alcohol to lubricate the wheels of social interaction rather than engaging in affinity or empathy;

whinging about others rather than taking personal responsibility for their own failings;

inventing Political Correctness to conceal their fear of anyone (& anything) different;

discomfort with emotions and sensations - their own and others;

fear of intelligent people;

obsession with Sex as a solace for lovelessness;

lack of realism from living in a White supremacist fantasy world;

fear of failure;

fear of success;

trying to get their friends to like them for fear that they actually do not;

Copyright © 2011 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://whitespeak.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved. Frank TALKER is also the author of Sweaty Socks: A Treatise on the Inevitability of Toe Jam in Hot Weather (East Cheam Press: Groper Books, 1997) and is University of Bullshit Professor Emeritus of Madeupology.

Magazine Calls Rihanna the 'Ultimate Nigger Bitch'

2011-12-20T15:48:00.003Z

(Image: http://madamenoire.com/)

When Whites are caught being White supremacist, they claim it as a joke that was not meant to harm, yet pretend to offer sorrow for the harm they know they have intentionally caused. Why make jokes about others' suffering, unless you have something profound to say? Eva HOEKE is a White supremacist who thinks supremacist humor is OK, so long as no White complains.

Rihanna comes from Barbados, not Jamaica, so this is not only White supremacist journalism it is poorly-researched. Because Whites regularly-stereotype Blacks, they do not believe they have to discover the truth about them; hence, one learns little about Rihanna from the article and everything about the White supremacist intentions of the author.

Whites are terrified of Black sexuality; seeing it as natural and spontaneous - unlike their own. Whites fear that Blacks will become sexually attractive to enough repressed Whites to induce sufficient miscegenation such that White birth rates will decline and Blacks increase. Such a demographic shift would give Blacks more of the political power that White supremacist immigration controls are designed to suppress. The author is sexually-aroused by Rihanna and is trying to mock his own feelings of sexual self-disgust by mocking her; the fear being of what his parents would say if he presented a Black woman as a potential spouse. Would they touch or kiss Black grandchildren or go anywhere near them?

Copyright © 2011 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://protectingthehated.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved. Frank TALKER is also the author of Sweaty Socks: A Treatise on the Inevitability of Toe Jam in Hot Weather (East Cheam Press: Groper Books, 1997) and is University of Bullshit Professor Emeritus of Madeupology.

Gone With the Wind (1939)

2011-08-26T10:22:00.004+01:00

RATING:	100%
FORMAT:	DVD

(Image: http://www.fanpop.com/)

Better an English girl than a Yankee!

Fascinating Black History Month type movie that perfectly encapsulates - like no other - the ambivalent feelings Whites have about the White supremacism that built their present-day culture. Here there is a constant attempt to whitewash slavery by not presenting it as it really was and, simultaneously, by claiming there was something noble about living high on the hog of Black misery - on land stolen from Indians. This, bizarrely, is presented as a romantic ideal; without political commentary or irony. Hardly surprising then that despite the mass of special features presented here not a single Black person could be found to praise the film - not even from among those featured in it.

(Image: http://en.wikipedia.org/)

The inherent White supremacism of the movie is exacerbated by political correctness that uses words like "pretty" and "civilized" to speak of a culture based on genocide is a cognitively-impaired use of such terms. And yet no White here is shown-up as mentally-ill. Eschewing Margaret Mitchell's overt White supremacism, the movie of her one and only novel tries to evade the issue - and that of secessionism - to avoid offending anyone. There are no "Niggers" or Ku Klux Klan in this movie and so it focuses on a complex love story rather than ethics.

(Image: http://wwww.fanpop.com/)

The reason this film works as brilliantly as it does - but only as drama (not history) - is because of superb performances, vivid cinematography, excellent writing, superlative direction - all of which achieve a combination that is well-nigh perfect. White supremacism never seemed so reasonable - as if morality were relative rather than absolute; as if the material benefits of anti-Semitism were being celebrated (SS officers as chivalrous knights) while healthy Jews are worked to death to pay for it all. This expresses the problem for Whites today, how to account for the wealth of the West without reference to slavery and imperialism. Turning it into a love story is no real answer - except for guilt-ridden Whites.

(Image: http://www.fading-tomorrow.com/)

It is hard to feel empathy for a people who, despite so-called "gumption" and lack thereof, are always going to be more successful because of the moral value attached to their skin color by Whites. "Gumption" thus becomes a synonym for an Old Boy Network and/or collective narcissism that obviates the need for a superhuman effort to survive a culture that has gone with the wind. Yet despite Scarlett O’Hara's manipulativeness, immaturity, narcissism and egomania (symptomatic of many Whites) she still holds your attention throughout: A testament to the same qualities in her impersonator, Vivien LEIGH.

(Image: http://www.gonemovies.com/)

Business-wise, this is a rare example of a brilliant film effectively directed by its producer: Forget about Citizen Kane, this is probably the best, most popular film ever made.

(Image: http://ktismatics.wordpress.com/)

Copyright © 2011 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://franktalker5.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

David STARKEY, CBE, FSA (1945-)

2011-08-14T14:09:00.003+01:00

(Image: http://en.wikipedia.org/)

'...[T]he whites have become black...'

(Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/)

Africa Squadron (1843 - 1859)

2011-03-22T11:24:00.006Z

(Image: http://en.wikipedia.org/)

Fleet of American ships that sailed along the coast of West Africa during the nineteenth century for the purpose of suppressing the Atlantic slave trade.

the United States Navy’s African Squadron was sent to West Africa after the Treaty of Washington (1842), which provided for a joint armed British and American squadron to enforce both countries’ laws against the slave trade. From 1843 to 1859 the American fleet of sailing cruisers, based in the Cape Verde islands, freed 7,745 slaves and seized 35 ships (compared to 45,600 slaves freed and 595 ships seized by the British). Only 19 slavers were ever brought to trial.

from the beginning, several obstacles prevented the squadron from effectively stopping all the American slave-trading heading from West Africa to the American South. Although the squadron was supposed to function jointly with British sailing ships, the latter were based in Sierra Leone, and mutual suspicion led the fleets to limit each others’ rights to search the other country’s ships. In addition, the US Navy secretaries, most of whom were from the pro-slavery South, provided the squadron with only eighty guns and a few aging ships, including the famed fifty-one-gun USS Constitution. Other obstacles included the squadron’s base in Cape Verde, which by the mid-1800s was far from the center of slave-trading activity (then in Nigeria), and the American slaving ships’ tendency to disguise themselves by flying the Portuguese flag. The squadron operated on an annual budget of US$250,000, but its highest cost was in human lives: Many American sailors died of malaria, yellow fever and other tropical diseases. In 1859 the ships were recalled to the United States to enforce a blockade against the South during the Civil War there.

Golly Wallies (2007)

2011-03-20T14:29:00.013Z

(Image: http://www.thesun.co.uk/)

Whites unable to reclaim their culture without revealing how White supremacist it is

White Child in hospital for alcohol abuse

2011-03-14T11:04:00.018Z

(Image: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/)

Why on Earth would Whites treat their own children like this? Frank TALKER blames the suicidally-high White alcohol-abuse rates (September 2003 - PDF document download) across England.

White Guilt Is Counterproductive

2011-01-19T12:37:00.002Z

(Image: http://kittywampus.wordpress.com/)

whites are only ever concerned when a fact is counterproductive for them

Whites want to evade guilt for their unearned privilege, so claim guilt is counterproductive. Yet Blacks know better than Whites that the guilt Whites experience because of that unearned privilege is the just punishment for the existence of such privilege. The gulf between the two sides is always going to be wide so long as this fact is not clearly understood, accepted and acted upon.

Guilt is a painful experience that requires great effort and courage to overcome; courage and industry that Whites lack precisely because White privilege encourages Whites to become complacent and lazy - especially ethically. If you look at the guilt pedophiles possess because of what they do to children and the fact that none of their kind has ever been cured of the desire for sex with children, you can see how far Whites still have to go to cure themselves of the inferiority complexes known more commonly as White supremacism and Negrophobia.

The function of guilt is to alert the guilty to the fact that they have done wrong - either absolutely or in relation to their moral values. Guilt is thus the starting point for self-reappraisal and change. To re-label guilt as counterproductive, as Tim Wise foolishly does, is to say that guilt is irrelevant and useless. This is the same as saying that a fire alarm is irrelevant when there is a fire - even though it would result in no action being taken to put out the fire. This proves that White guilt and shame are still so pervasive and so profoundly felt that Whites still desperately try to evade its inevitably-negative consequences and, in the process, damn Blacks to being always treated by Whites as genetic inferiors.

The solution is for Whites to exploit their guilt constructively and not simply self-indulgently wallow in it as White anti-racists do, by effectively challenging their own unearned privileges (as Time Wise, Robert Jensen, Noel Ignatiev & others have done) and learn to stand on their own two feet as grown-ups do. Of course, this requires that Whites put themselves in the firing line usually referred to as becoming a Nigger-lover, and how many Whites are really willing to put their own lives on the line to protect those of Blacks? Like the question every US Secret Service agent has to consider - would you use your own body to stop a bullet aimed at the President? - trying to evade the unevadable - Guilt - is never going to answer this question nor is it going to enable Whites to mature as people, into people, and so unreconstructed Whites will always be the emotional and ethical cripples they currently choose to remain. And children always choose what gives them pleasure because they have not yet learned adult responsibility and have never been taught this so do not know any better.

Kittywampus deliberately equates feeling guilty with renouncing privilege - even though they are unrelated - in order to vainly get around her own feelings of guilt. All that is being asked is that unearned privileges be renounced. Whites are not required to forgo college but they are required to prove that they have a right to be there over and above their Whiteness. Few Whites can do this. To claim that guilt paralyses and is solipsistic is a self-fulfilling prophecy that encourages running away from it and living in denial. It is only these things for people who choose it to be these things. Kittywampus's problem is her lack of experience of human variation - a typically White supremacist stance that proves her attempt to hijack the national debate on White supremacism in favor of Whites. No-one can ever be responsible without acknowledging the power of guilt in our lives, for only in this way is redemption possible. After all, redemption without guilt would be as meaningless as sex without love. This is the usual White attempt at success without achievement characteristic of their apartheid-style political life.