The world revolves around them...
Thursday, 27 February 2014
White Guide to Writing History
(2012)
Saturday, 22 February 2014
Black people according to white people
(2010)
Friday, 21 February 2014
Barbara Bush Award for Deluded Whiteness
(2009)
The White need to believe Blacks are fit only for Poverty to evade their Guilt...
Wednesday, 19 February 2014
“Go back to Africa”
Go back to school...
Tuesday, 18 February 2014
WHITE MAN’S BURDEN:
Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done so Much Ill and so Little Good
(2006)
RATING: | 60% |
FORMAT: | Book |
Interesting book about Whites and their inability to find a means of effectively helping the Third World; resulting from the White inability to see beyond the profound institutional limitations of both Foreign Aid or Military Intervention - and, indeed, their own limited culture.
Because it is written by a White, he is unable to be honest about the endemic malice and condescension of Whites toward non-Whites. Generalized vindictiveness that causes them to create poverty-reduction plans Whites know are not going to work: Plans designed to disincentivize large-scale migration of Third World poor and to prevent non-Whites from becoming economic competitors in global Capitalism. The War on Terror makes things worse because Whites imagine (as they do regarding their own countries’ crime rates) that terrorism is caused by poverty. That the causes of terrorism are actually the self-same foreign intervention (supposedly designed to alleviate poverty) is conveniently and deliberately elided.
The book also fails to compare - in depth - Foreign Aid with Domestic Welfare such that the similar reasons for the failure of both remain unilluminated. Moreover, White guilt and White narcissism are not assigned their due place in explaining why Whites want to save the world, but have no plan for saving the world from Whites. Whites wish to recreate the world in their own image and so fantasize about being Aryan supermen: The only kind of people Whites imagine can achieve such goals. Utopian for Whites; Dystopian for everyone else. Rather than look at the actual problems of others, Whites choose to see others only in comparison to themselves; presenting a distorted view of objective reality.
The author’s political naivety stems from a belief in the essential goodness of Whites, a belief that only Whites, themselves, possess. As well as their neurotic inability to divorce Intentions from Acts such that preaching what to do becomes a greater goal than actually doing anything. Whites seek a mirror in which to permanently admire themselves; ignoring the suffering they claim to be alleviating as the only means of evading their own inner emptiness. This is why Whites rarely focus on outcomes but on intentions, since positive outcomes are harder to find.
The author’s realization that self-directed and organic development is the only way forward for the world’s poor (as practiced in the First World) is likely to go unheeded. Detested Whites (like Bob Geldof & Bono) are far too keen to publicly remain at the center of their own vain pipe-dreams of sainthood than they are to actually listen to the poor. Helping the world’s poor by funding the poor’s own ideas for development - since the poor are the only people who understand the situation on the ground because of their daily experience of it - keeps Whites from hogging the limelight and, hence, is not favored by them.
Friday, 14 February 2014
Numéro does blackface – again
What Whites think of Blacks...
Saturday, 8 February 2014
Giardino dei Finzi-Contini
[Garden of the Finzi-Continis]
(1970)
RATING: | 80% |
FORMAT: | DVD |
Banality of Evil
Engaging film about White moral evasion in the face of the underlying White supremacy of their culture and its effects on their ability to be happy and that of others simply to continue existing. Here, Whites retreat into a literal fantasy Eden in order to banish thoughts of the real world from their desired carefree existences.
Film is also about the White emotional control needed to live within the political limitations of a culture as ethically-limited as White culture; conforming their emotions and friendships to the prevailing political orthodoxy, such that Whites appear as hollow-eyed in their personal relationships as they do in their political ones.
White politics makes personal relationships impossible because of this desired emotional repression, since Whites have to conflate the Personal with the Political to achieve social acceptance; making Fascism an inevitably White psychological illness and morbid obsession. By abandoning the needs and benefits of the Family to those of the State, Whites doom themselves to La Gabbia.
Fascinating as a companion-piece to Il Conformista.
OBAMISTAN!
Land Without Racism:
Your Guide to the New America
(2010)
RATING: | 80% |
FORMAT: | Book |
Amusing and accurate satire on non-Black culture.
Tuesday, 4 February 2014
Some facts about racism
(2010)
The so-called Race Card is useless to Blacks - it only works for Whites...
Monday, 3 February 2014
What if blacks talked about black-on-white murder the way whites talk about slavery or Trayvon?
(2012)
Whites are self-absorbed, so do not care...
Sunday, 2 February 2014
White Rules For Thinking About Black People
(2013)
The mental impoverishment of Whites...