Saturday 18 August 2012

White Men Playing with Themselves
(2012)



There is no gene for ethics or morality, so this is just more of the scientific racism one has come to expect from Whites.

There is no proof that genes determine character so this is really a eugenics program to kill-off those one does not approve of. This scientist claims the existence of practical ethics as if there could be such a thing as impractical ethics. Only when ethics is universal can such an idea work, since one could easily - as the Nazis did - conclude that Homosexuals, Jehovah's Witnesses and Freemasons are unethical and destroy them for not being Aryan enough.

It is important for science to stop dabbling in politics unless it has objective proof of its assertions - which it clearly lacks here.

The ethics one claims to be able to produce children to be better able to fit, need to be not practical - whatever that means - but objective. Human beings have never agreed on this and science has never provided an objective basis for such a determination. Moreover, a moral obligation can never exist because morality is about choice, not duty. To claim that such a thing does exist is to tacitly admit one does not understand ethics and that one does not behave in accordance with any of its tenets – precisely because one does not understand the moral life.

Claims like Better or More Intelligent have no objective meaning unless they are scientifically defined. Politically, they mean Conformist and Being Less Prone to Disagree. Claiming responsible parenting is based on Nazi eugenics is a paradox since it means parenting would become no longer necessary to produce good people, since parenting is then transferred to the test tube.

If it is bad to cause harm, then genetically-engineered people will not defend themselves when they are attacked by non genetically-engineered people. The latter will, therefore, be dead and dead people can be neither better nor worse.

There is little evidence for the existence of a natural lottery since Natural Selection is considered synonymous with the concept of Survival-of-the-Fittest - nature screens out useless mutations already. Rational design is not a natural extension of screening for physical diseases since the latter is proven science while the former is not.

All of this gibberish comes down to the tacit admission that Whites have failed to produce ethical cultures because of their preference for such things as White supremacy, Social Snobbery, Sexism, Erotophobia, Pornography, Divorce, Adultery, Alcoholism, Drug-Addiction, etc. Because White culture is essentially a failed culture, Whites now want to try to make people good by accepting bizarre genetic theories and then pretend that these can be used to create better people in the laboratory. Could Whites have been more abjectly-explicit than this at their failure to be as good (or better) than other cultures - who do not face these problems to the same great extent Whites do? Whites have clearly given-up on themselves as viable human beings and are now determined to destroy themselves with pseudo-science because of centuries of guilt for not being as superior as they think they are.

Her is a scientist without scientific merit who bases his work on possibilities, suggestions and likelihoods, tied to his own ball and chain of squeamishness (yet who claims genetically-engineered people are less likely to cause harm - how is that for squeamishness?) and irrationality. Like one of the human-hating charlatans who claims intelligence can be measured, this is a desperate and despairing attempt to make genetics a hard science - as opposed to a soft one - because it cannot make the same hard-&-fast predictions about existence that, for example, chemistry and physics can.


Copyright © 2012 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://whitespeak.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Thursday 16 August 2012

White Reality
(2012)

An Angry White Female (AWF) responded to Frank TALKER’s comment regarding this article:

‘The Jefferson Lies,’ David Barton's Controversial Best Seller, Dropped By Publishing House For Factual Errors

Frank TALKER said:

Whites are trying to re-write their history because of the shame and guilt it causes them - they are the ethnic group least proud of its heritage. [HuffPost Comments]

The AWF said:

...[O]ne man twisting history is no reflection on all whites. You would have to count exactly how many whites have deliberately falsified history and prove that every single white person has done so to be telling the truth. It is just reverse racism. [HuffPost Comments]


Apart from the fact that Frank TALKER never claimed one White person's behavior reflected badly on all Whites - the claim is nothing more than White paranoia - Whites posit a false standard of proof which they claim is required to be 100%. They only do this with regard to issues that make them look bad - never regarding issues that make them look good. (Notice also her claim that reverse racism exists, despite the complete lack of evidence for this: A claim designed to implicitly deny the existence of Institutional Racism.)

When Whites are accused of being White supremacist, they angrily demand 100% proof. When Whites accuse Blacks of being inferior, Whites never offer proof to the same impossible level. In other words, if Blacks cannot prove all Whites racist, then White culture cannot be Institutionally-Racist. This is as nutty as claiming that Nazi Germany was not Nazi because you cannot prove that all Germans were Nazi; meaning Nazi Germany wasn’t really Nazi at all. Could you get any more White supremacist than that?

There are no historical examples of 100% proof being presented to demonstrate anything. To claim its need is symptomatic of the negative affect of White supremacy on the White intellect: It makes Whites claim the existence of the impossible to compensate for the complete lack of proof for White, genetic superiority.

In criminal law, even Whites only demand proof that is beyond a reasonable doubt - not 100%. In civil law, the White standard is the balance of probabilities - not 100% proof.

In science, scientists come to conclusions based upon available, empirical evidence. They are always forced to acknowledge they do not know all the knowable facts and that, because of this, their conclusions are subject to constant change. By definition, it is impossible to know the full extent of what one does not know - nor what remains to be known - so this will always be the case.

Whites thus demand 100% proof of the existence of White supremacy; knowing full well that no such proof can ever exist. This makes Whites believe that the existence of Institutional Racism can always be denied, while the guilty White conscience can be appeased and placated. At least until the next Black man is killed while being arrested and/or in police custody.

Another benefit of playing the White Race Card is that Whites can then claim that all cultures are racist and that Whites are no better nor worse than anyone else. And that there is such a thing as reverse racism, despite the fact that Whites could never suffer to the same degree as Blacks, given their numerical superiority. All without evidence or (100%) proof, naturally.

Whites have no other history than White supremacy so, to retain the advantages of same, they teach racist lies as fact in a desperate attempt to avoid rebuttal and the open revelation of their lazy dependency on White supremacy to survive.

The corollary of this is that Whites make the study of their own history deliberately dull in order to vainly hide its supremacist essence and the still current relevance of racism to their success in life.

The only reason to fear any truth is because it reveals that one is benefiting from illegal and/or immoral activity. This fear refutes the White fallacy of being self-made men when they can all benefit from the White supremacy they gainsay. Trying to hide ongoing affirmative action for Whites (endemic White racism) is the only way Whites try to evade White guilt and shame for such action. Thus, perversely, Whites worship the very ideology that makes a full human life for them impossible. They have to become schizophrenic to simultaneously deny the existence of White supremacy while desperately trying to maintain its benefits.

The only other reason to hide anything is for the purposes of self-protection and self-defense. But, that does not apply regarding White racism since White supremacists are not under any threat from non-Whites - that Whites can successfully and logically articulate. Thus, the White guilt complex is the only reason Whites falsify their history on a regular basis. And why they claim Blacks must abide by a false definition of proof that White statements are never tested against.


Copyright © 2012 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://whitespeak.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Friday 10 August 2012

“Mixed Race” for Beginners

(2012)

Blacks who think they are "Biracial" or "Mixed Race" are still "Niggers" to Whites. Such Blacks confuse genetics with politics in the same deliberate way Whites do to justify crimes against humanity like Apartheid. Only Blacks do it to appease White supremacists.

In genetics, one is what ones genetic make-up makes one; in politics, you can all-too-easily become what others try to make you - if you are not careful enough to be self-respecting. Neither arse-licking nor appeasement ever works with Whites - just look at what happened to the Jews when Whites tried it with Hitler.

"Mixed Race" is a Nazi category that neither exists in genetics nor reality. If a Black breeds with a White, the resulting child is as human as its parents and not a member of a separate race or species. Believing anything else is a racist hangover from the days when Whites perverted their own science for political gain.

So this is just another Black pretending they are not really black in the desperate hope that White supremacists will leave them alone.

Mixed breeding in dogs is fine, but dogs do not racially-abuse each other, so it will not work in humans because the latter do.


Copyright © 2012 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://whitespeak.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Sunday 5 August 2012

White Culture
(2012)



Don’t Buy into It...

Whites are scared that their culture is finally going down the toilet of history, so now they seek to gain attention by being as provocative as they can about how superior they are despite the decline. They see no other way to deal with their failings other than to pretend that they do not really exist while, simultaneously, concluding that they are caused by others.

Creating victims via inappropriate aggression - where none would normally exist - is essential to Whites. Otherwise, they would have no-one to contrast themselves with nor to feel superior towards.

Whites love this sort of rubbish and it is, therefore, essential reading for Blacks since it shows them what Whites are really like - under the skin; saving them the necessity of getting to know any Whites to ensure ones distaste of them is factually based so that Whites cannot counter any accusations of White supremacy laid against Whites by saying that the (Black) accusers do not know any White people.

That so many White women (teachers) read the newspaper is proof of how retarded they are and explains why the UK education system is in the mess it is in.

This is the kind of bile that Whites will produce given that their culture is based on self-hatred and the resulting self-delusion. This is why Whites rarely read non-White newspapers, in case they see themselves as others see them, which would be even more frightening than the content of The Daily Mail.

The other unstated problem here is that print journalism is dying; hence, the desperation to maintain - and possibly even increase - circulation by printing White self-indulgence in the only form of expression open to the volitionally emotionally-repressed and the only non-spontaneous ethnic group: The claim that the world owes it a living by accepting second-class citizenship as a birthright so that Whites can be superior by default and with as little effort as possible. This is Whites letting off steam because of the workaday mundanity of their insular lives.


Copyright © 2012 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://whitespeak.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Thursday 2 August 2012

How Whites Think
(2012)


Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression, Acceptance...

The reporting is White supremacist precisely because that is how White culture is.

Whites will always claim bad White behavior is individual while bad Black behavior is collective: Whites do not see Blacks as individuals. And Whites commit most of the pedophilia so want to distract attention from their own collusion in the rape of their own children.

The guilt problem is that Whites produce many children who put themselves in danger through bad parenting, yet Whites prefer to claim that the racism of others is at fault and not poor quality upbringings. Ethnic-minority pedophile groups can prey on White girls because they are the easiest, not the Whitest.

Whites never learn from their own history because they have developed selective memories. Whites still wish to scapegoat entire communities for the White failure to develop a culture that is worthwhile rather than simply rapacious. This is why Whites confuse legality with their culture, in the vain hope of legalizing White supremacy.

Despite the lack of evidence of a component of racial aggravation in these cases, Whites still choose to believe that when Blacks commit crimes against Whites it is always racially-motivated. They believe everyone else is as racist as they are on an It-takes-one-to-know-one basis.

Such reporting does not create White supremacy, it is merely a reflection of it. White culture would have no substance whatsoever without its irrational fear of others. That is, in fact, the definition of White culture: Xenophobia.

Whites do not deny that their culture is White supremacist - realistically, they can’t - they will simply defend it with any irrational nonsense to preserve the very sense of superiority causing the problem in the first place.


Copyright © 2011 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://whitespeak.blogspot.com/) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.